top of page
THIS WAS SENT TO AURORA HOSPITAL & IT WAS IGNORED


ADA ACCOMMODATION REQUEST FOR: AURORA HOSPITAL 3/9/2020
PATIENT: - --------------------------------- -


TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PATIENT STATUS (NOT A DRUG ABUSER) & MODALITY OF TREATMENTS.


I JOHN S. LINDSEY (10-4-64) P.O. BOX 4123 (422 YANKEE VISTA DR. PVT) OROVILLE, CA 95965 HAVE SEEN ----------------------- FUNCTION BEST WITH THESE MEDICATIONS, AND SHE CURRENTLY HAS A REFERRAL TO NEUROLOGY WITH OROVILLE HOSPITAL. AWAITING APPOINTMENT 60 TO 120 DAYS OUT.


[1] ZPREXA OR (ZYDIS)                 (----------------------------)
[2] HYDRO-CODONE                      (SYSTEMIC ------- PAIN)
[3] VALIUM                                       (SEVERE ----------)
[4] SEROQUEL                                 (------ DISORDER)


JOHN S. LINDSEY IS WILLING TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NARCOTIC MEDICATIONS & OR THEY CAN BE PRESCRIBED EVERY 15 DAYS.


PATIENT: ----- ------- HAS THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ACCESS THESE MEDICATIONS, AND MUST BE ASKED IF THEY HELP HER FUNCTION AND IF SHE SAYS "YES" THEY MUST BE OFFERED TO HER BY PRESCRIBING DOCTORS AS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT CASES CLEARLY ESTABLISH.


PENDING THE RESULTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM AN ADDITIONAL LICENSED NEUROLOGIST'S MEDICAL EVALUATION OF:


1) THE ANATOMICAL BRAIN DEFORMITIES


2) THE MISSING BRAIN STRUCTURES RELATED TO CHEMISTRY


3) THE AFFECTS PERTAINING TO BEHAVIOR & MEDICATIONS


4) THE NEUROLOGIST'S RECOMMENDED MEDICAL TREATMENTS


5) THE LAWFUL RIGHT TO 'A NARCOTIC BRAIN PROSTHETIC'


6) THE U.S. SUPREME COURT CASES LISTED
THAT SHOULD BE USED FOR MY CONDITION BUT HAVE NOT BEEN LEGALLY ADDRESSED, BECAUSE THE COMPONENTS OF MY 'MEDICAL CONDITIONS & STANDARDS OF CARE' OR REFERENCE POINTS FOR 'STANDARD OF OR MODALITY OF CARE'
ARE NOT ENUMERATED IN THE:


'The American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition'


WHICH defines the symptoms and behaviors of mental disorders. This manual is the authority in classifying mental health disorders.
AND COVERS ONLY HALF OF --- ------- LEGAL RIGHTS TO MEDICAL EVALUATION.


IT HAS NO PROVISION FOR ANATOMICALLY DAMAGED OR MISSING BRAIN STRUCTURES OR 'MEDICAL AFFECT ON BRAIN CHEMISTRY OR POTENTIAL MODALITIES FOR IT'.


IN VIOLATION OF MY 8TH & 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
EVIDENCED BY THE U.S. SUPREME COURT CASES
AND OTHER MATERIAL REFERENCED BELOW.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Supreme Court of the United States
Glen Burton Ake v. Oklahoma
Citations 470 U.S. 68 (more) 105 S. Ct. 1087; 84 L. Ed. 2d 53; 1985 U.S. LEXIS 52; 53 U.S.L.W. 4179


Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required the state to provide a
** psychiatric evaluation


(------ ------- HAS 2 CONDITIONS TO EVALUATE - ADDITIONAL NEUROLOGISTS ANATOMICAL RESULTS IN BRAIN CHEMISTRY ) [JSL]


NEUROLOGICAL ANATOMICAL CONDITIONS & STANDARDS OF CARE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED [JSL]


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Supreme Court of the United States
Albert L. Trop v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State, et al. Citations 356 U.S. 86 (more) 78 S. Ct. 590; 2 L. Ed. 2d 630; 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1284
Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to revoke CITIZENSHIP as a punishment for a crime.


The ruling's reference to "evolving standards of decency" is frequently cited in Eighth Amendment jurisprudence


** Citizenship = (A LEGAL STATUS)
(DISABLED AMERICAN WITH SPECIAL MEDICAL NEEDS - LEGAL STATUS AS DRUG ABUSER HAS NOT BEEN LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED),


BECAUSE A NEUROLOGIST HAS NOT OPINED IF -------- ----- CONDITION WARRANTS OUTSIDE CHEMICAL INPUT


(A BRAIN PROSTHETIC) FOR STABILITY AND CONTROL OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTION, AND -------- INPUT HAS BEEN UNLAWFULLY IGNORED. [ JSL]


====================================================


In The Supreme Court of the United States
SCOTT LYNN GIBSON, ALSO KNOWN AS VANESSA LYNN, Petitioner, v. BRYAN COLLIER AND DR. D. GREENE, Respondents.
LANTAGNE LEGAL PRINTING 801 East Main Street Suite 100 Richmond VA 23219 (800) 847-0477
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit


PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI


In the landmark case of Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976), this Court held that: elementary principles establish the government’s obligation to provide medical care for those whom it is punishing by incarceration. 
An inmate must rely on prison authorities to treat his medical needs;


** The Potential Necessity of Medical Treatment Should Not Be Defeated As A Matter Of Law Unless That Treatment is Universally Accepted


* A. The Unworkable “Universal” Acceptance Standard


===================================================


1/28/2014 BRAIN MRI OF --------- @ OPEN SYSTEMS IMAGING CHICO, CA # 026--- CAN BE REFERENCED TO ORDER A NEW LEGALLY VIABLE MRI & NEUROLOGIST'S MRI MEDICAL REPORT.


------- WAS PAIN MANAGEMENT PATIENT IN SACARMENTO 2011 FOR THE --- WHEN I MET HER, AND HAS SINCE SUFFERED MISS-APPLICATION OF CDC OPIOID GUIDELINES.


REFUSING THIS REQUEST WOULD UNLAWFULLY VIOLATE --------- LEGAL RIGHTS TO ADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE, BECAUSE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PSYCHIATRIC DOCTORS WILL ONLY AFFORD STANDARDS OF CARE FOR MEDICAL CONDITIONS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY & UNLAWFULLY ESTABLISHED.


https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2019/s0424-advises-misapplication-guideline-prescribing-opioids.html


https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Documents/Don'tDropYourPatient_9.11.19.pdf  

bottom of page