top of page

2nd Amendment Actionable Crimes Of:

U.S. Department Of Justice & The U.S. Supreme Court & Federal Bureau Of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, ET AL


'Subversion Of U.S. Constitution 2nd Amendment Right To Keep And Bear Arms'. By Changing The Legal Definition Of The Words & Phrase 'KEEP And BEAR ARMS'


'Subversion Of U.S. Constitution Article 6, Clause 2, Ratified Universal Declaration Of Human Rights 1949' & Other Treaties'


For Unlawfully Protecting The 1st Amendment Far More Than The 2nd Amendment, And Interpreting Rights As Domestic Enemies


Enacting Laws & Policies That Are 'Ratified Treaty Reservations' Unlawfully Written & Enacted & Enforced By Domestic Enemies Of The U.S.A. Population Knowingly Harming U.S. Residents.


'Financial Enslavement' & 'RICO Act Crimes'


https://thefederalist.com/2018/05/09/heres-supreme-court-already-repealed-second-amendment/


https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/23/politics/supreme-court-heller-Thomas-2nd-amendment/index.html?

utm_source=feed%20burner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+rs%252Fcnn_latest+(RS%253A+CNN+-+Most+Recent)


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/02/Clarence-Thomas-guns/553910/


In The U.S. SUPREME COURT Judge Clarence Thomas Broke His 11-year Silence On The Bench — To Ask

Assistant U.S. Solicitor General Elana Eisenstein

WHY A MISDEMEANOR CONVICTION FOR DOMESTIC ABUSE SHOULD DEPRIVE THE ABUSER OF THE RIGHT TO POSSESS FIREARMS:


" CAN YOU THINK OF ANOTHER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT THAT CAN BE SUSPENDED BASED UPON A MISDEMEANOR VIOLATION OF A STATE LAW ? "


U.S. Supreme Court decided, 6 to 2, that Congress could outlaw gun possession by abusers, Thomas dissented, writing, “Under the majority’s reading, a single conviction under a state assault statute for recklessly causing an injury to a family member—such as by testing while driving—can now trigger a lifetime ban on gun ownership. … We treat no other constitutional right so cavalierly.”


Thomas complains, the Court intervenes to protect rights like free speech, fair trial, and even reproductive choice—and yet ignores limits on gun possession.


Thomas complained that “[t]he right to keep and bear arms is apparently this Court’s constitutional orphan.”


WHICH IS EVIDENCE OF UNLAWFUL BIAS & CRIMINAL SUBVERSION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES RULE OF LAW BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (D.O.J), THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, AND ALL BRANCHES OF FEDERAL & STATES GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS & AGENCIES THAT AID & ABED THEIR CRIMINALITY (HIGH CRIMES)

.........................................................................

bottom of page